Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://ir.ncue.edu.tw/ir/handle/987654321/14379
|
| Title: | 姚際恆《詩經通論》的《詩》教觀及其反漢學色彩
The view of moral education of Shi Jing and the characteristics of the anti-Han school of Yao Ji-Heng Shi Jing Tong Lun |
| Authors: | 黃忠慎 |
| Contributors: | 國文學系 |
| Keywords: | 姚際恆;《詩經通論》;《詩序》;《毛傳》;鄭《箋》
Yao Ji-Heng;Shi Jing Tong Lun;Shi Xu;Mao Chuan;Zheng Jian |
| Date: | 2011-06
|
| Issue Date: | 2012-10-25T08:40:06Z
|
| Publisher: | 國立臺灣師範大學國文系 |
| Abstract: | 姚際恆與崔述、方玉潤並稱為清代獨立治《詩》三大家，三人三書都有強烈
的批判性，其中尤以姚際恆《詩經通論》為最。姚際恆對於歷代的解《詩》成果
都不滿意，愈是權威性的、典範性的著作，愈容易成為姚氏的批評對象，於是，
完成於漢代的《毛詩》學派解詩系統──《詩序》、《毛傳》、鄭《箋》成為姚氏
首要推翻的《詩》學文本。本文分析姚際恆《詩經通論》的《詩》教觀及其反漢
學色彩，歸結出姚氏批評《詩序》、《毛傳》、鄭《箋》的內容，也針對這些內容
進行評論，最後並指出姚書解釋意涵中的漢學風味，以突顯出該書的一大特色。
Yao Ji-Heng and Cui-Su, Fang Yu-run were called the three masters of Shijing in
Qing Dynasty .They had the most independent spirit in their research .They had a strong
critical character in their books, Yao Ji-Heng Shi Jing Tong Lun especially. The more
authoritative and paradigmatic those works are, the more easily they tend to be the object
of Yao Ji-Heng’s criticism.In this particular interpretation of the viewpoint, the Han
Dynasty, Mao School representatives──Shi Xu,Mao Chuan,Zheng Jian, as the target
that Yao Ji-Heng wanted to overthrow. In this thesis, we analyzed the view of moral
education of Shi Jing and the anti-Han school feature of Yao Ji-Heng, generalized and
remarked the work of Yao’s criticizing Shi-Xu,Mao-Chuan,Zheng-Jian. In the end we
pointed out the Han school savor of the intention in Yao’s explanation,in order to
highlight the clearest character of Yao’s book. |
| Relation: | 國文學報, 49: 87-106 |
| Appears in Collections: | [國文學系] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 2040101410021.pdf | 894Kb | Adobe PDF | 1094 | View/Open |
|
All items in NCUEIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
