資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
http://ir.ncue.edu.tw/ir/handle/987654321/14379
|
題名: | 姚際恆《詩經通論》的《詩》教觀及其反漢學色彩 The view of moral education of Shi Jing and the characteristics of the anti-Han school of Yao Ji-Heng Shi Jing Tong Lun |
作者: | 黃忠慎 |
貢獻者: | 國文學系 |
關鍵詞: | 姚際恆;《詩經通論》;《詩序》;《毛傳》;鄭《箋》 Yao Ji-Heng;Shi Jing Tong Lun;Shi Xu;Mao Chuan;Zheng Jian |
日期: | 2011-06
|
上傳時間: | 2012-10-25T08:40:06Z
|
出版者: | 國立臺灣師範大學國文系 |
摘要: | 姚際恆與崔述、方玉潤並稱為清代獨立治《詩》三大家,三人三書都有強烈 的批判性,其中尤以姚際恆《詩經通論》為最。姚際恆對於歷代的解《詩》成果 都不滿意,愈是權威性的、典範性的著作,愈容易成為姚氏的批評對象,於是, 完成於漢代的《毛詩》學派解詩系統──《詩序》、《毛傳》、鄭《箋》成為姚氏 首要推翻的《詩》學文本。本文分析姚際恆《詩經通論》的《詩》教觀及其反漢 學色彩,歸結出姚氏批評《詩序》、《毛傳》、鄭《箋》的內容,也針對這些內容 進行評論,最後並指出姚書解釋意涵中的漢學風味,以突顯出該書的一大特色。 Yao Ji-Heng and Cui-Su, Fang Yu-run were called the three masters of Shijing in Qing Dynasty .They had the most independent spirit in their research .They had a strong critical character in their books, Yao Ji-Heng Shi Jing Tong Lun especially. The more authoritative and paradigmatic those works are, the more easily they tend to be the object of Yao Ji-Heng’s criticism.In this particular interpretation of the viewpoint, the Han Dynasty, Mao School representatives──Shi Xu,Mao Chuan,Zheng Jian, as the target that Yao Ji-Heng wanted to overthrow. In this thesis, we analyzed the view of moral education of Shi Jing and the anti-Han school feature of Yao Ji-Heng, generalized and remarked the work of Yao’s criticizing Shi-Xu,Mao-Chuan,Zheng-Jian. In the end we pointed out the Han school savor of the intention in Yao’s explanation,in order to highlight the clearest character of Yao’s book. |
關聯: | 國文學報, 49: 87-106 |
顯示於類別: | [國文學系] 期刊論文
|
文件中的檔案:
檔案 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
2040101410021.pdf | 894Kb | Adobe PDF | 1741 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在NCUEIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|