English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 6507/11669
造訪人次 : 29711490      線上人數 : 326
RC Version 3.2 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 進階搜尋

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.ncue.edu.tw/ir/handle/987654321/14379

題名: 姚際恆《詩經通論》的《詩》教觀及其反漢學色彩
The view of moral education of Shi Jing and the characteristics of the anti-Han school of Yao Ji-Heng Shi Jing Tong Lun
作者: 黃忠慎
貢獻者: 國文學系
關鍵詞: 姚際恆;《詩經通論》;《詩序》;《毛傳》;鄭《箋》
Yao Ji-Heng;Shi Jing Tong Lun;Shi Xu;Mao Chuan;Zheng Jian
日期: 2011-06
上傳時間: 2012-10-25T08:40:06Z
出版者: 國立臺灣師範大學國文系
摘要: 姚際恆與崔述、方玉潤並稱為清代獨立治《詩》三大家,三人三書都有強烈
的批判性,其中尤以姚際恆《詩經通論》為最。姚際恆對於歷代的解《詩》成果
都不滿意,愈是權威性的、典範性的著作,愈容易成為姚氏的批評對象,於是,
完成於漢代的《毛詩》學派解詩系統──《詩序》、《毛傳》、鄭《箋》成為姚氏
首要推翻的《詩》學文本。本文分析姚際恆《詩經通論》的《詩》教觀及其反漢
學色彩,歸結出姚氏批評《詩序》、《毛傳》、鄭《箋》的內容,也針對這些內容
進行評論,最後並指出姚書解釋意涵中的漢學風味,以突顯出該書的一大特色。
Yao Ji-Heng and Cui-Su, Fang Yu-run were called the three masters of Shijing in
Qing Dynasty .They had the most independent spirit in their research .They had a strong
critical character in their books, Yao Ji-Heng Shi Jing Tong Lun especially. The more
authoritative and paradigmatic those works are, the more easily they tend to be the object
of Yao Ji-Heng’s criticism.In this particular interpretation of the viewpoint, the Han
Dynasty, Mao School representatives──Shi Xu,Mao Chuan,Zheng Jian, as the target
that Yao Ji-Heng wanted to overthrow. In this thesis, we analyzed the view of moral
education of Shi Jing and the anti-Han school feature of Yao Ji-Heng, generalized and
remarked the work of Yao’s criticizing Shi-Xu,Mao-Chuan,Zheng-Jian. In the end we
pointed out the Han school savor of the intention in Yao’s explanation,in order to
highlight the clearest character of Yao’s book.
關聯: 國文學報, 49: 87-106
顯示於類別:[國文學系] 期刊論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
2040101410021.pdf894KbAdobe PDF1741檢視/開啟


在NCUEIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

 


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋