National Changhua University of Education Institutional Repository : Item 987654321/16014
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 6507/11669
造访人次 : 29929978      在线人数 : 481
RC Version 3.2 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 进阶搜寻

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.ncue.edu.tw/ir/handle/987654321/16014

题名: Comparing with Your Main Competitor: The Single Most Important Task of Knowledge Management Performance Measurement
作者: Huang, Mu-Jung;Chen, Mu-Yen;Yieh, Kaili
贡献者: 資訊管理學系
关键词: Competitiveness;Analytical network process (ANP);Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM);Knowledge management (KM);Quantitative modeling
日期: 2007-08
上传时间: 2013-04-22T07:39:16Z
出版者: SAGE
摘要: The single most important task of knowledge management (KM) performance measurement is comparing your company with its main rivals. Most of the metrics and methods of knowledge measurement that have been developed are concentrated on measuring the knowledge within the organization, which may be nice to know, but is not critical. In this paper, we propose a methodology for comparing a firm's knowledge management performance with its major rivals using the Analytical Network Process (ANP) to obtain a clear direction of the effort required to gain or maintain a competitive advantage. The ANP approach employed in the present study is a theory of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM), and is good at dealing with tangible and intangible information. Our methodology is designed to make a detailed comparison of a firm's KM performance with that of its main rivals, in order to be able to provide effective information for improving its KM and to increase its decision-making quality. This paper makes three important contributions: (1) it develops a comprehensive model, which incorporates a variety of issues for conducting KM performance measurements in comparison with major rivals; (2) case experience is provided to help us understand the advantages and disadvantages of the methodology for KM performance measurement from a practical point of view, and (3) the results obtained from exploring the case firm present changes that the case firm can make, implying that the case firm must reinforce its knowledge creation and internalization so as to improve its position in comparison with its most competitive rivals. The method proposed by this paper is generic in nature and is applicable to benefit any firm.
關聯: Journal of Information Science, 33(4): 416-434
显示于类别:[資訊管理學系所] 期刊論文

文件中的档案:

档案 大小格式浏览次数
index.html0KbHTML610检视/开启


在NCUEIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈