English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 6491/11663
Visitors : 23826532      Online Users : 106
RC Version 3.2 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Adv. Search

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.ncue.edu.tw/ir/handle/987654321/1616

Title: Disentangling the Effects of Applicant Defensive Impression Management Tactics in Job Interviews
Authors: Tsai, W. C.;Huang, T. C.;Wu, C. Y.;Lo, I. H.
Contributors: 人力資源管理研究所
Date: 2008
Issue Date: 2010-11-10T08:16:40Z
Abstract: This study explores (1) the effects that three kinds of applicant defensive impression management (IM) tactics (apologies, justifications, and excuses) have on interviewer evaluation and (2) the moderating effects that two types of interviewer negative concerns (competence-related and integrity-related concerns) have on the aforementioned relationship. Two hundred and one managers from Taiwan participated in this study by watching a simulated interview. Compared with the control group, applicants using defensive IM tactics received higher interviewer ratings when negative concerns surfaced. Moreover, the type of interviewer negative concern moderated the effects of defensive IM tactics. All three tactics had similar effects on interviewer evaluation when the concern was competence related. Apology was, however, the most effective tactic when the concern was integrity related.
Relation: International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(2):131-140, June 2010(ISSN: 0965075X)(DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00495.x)
Appears in Collections:[人力資源管理研究所] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat

All items in NCUEIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback