English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 6498/11670
Visitors : 25705874      Online Users : 157
RC Version 3.2 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Adv. Search
LoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.ncue.edu.tw/ir/handle/987654321/18159

Title: The Effect of Levels of Cooperation Within Physical Science Laboratory Groups on Physical Science Achievement
學生在理化實驗分組的合作程度對於理化學習成就的影響
Authors: Chang, Huey-Por
Contributors: 物理學系
Date: 1991-08
Issue Date: 2014-02-18T07:30:58Z
Publisher: Oregon State University
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the levels of group cooperation on students' achievement during a series of physical science laboratory activities. Six intact seventh grade physical science classes taught by two teachers, with each teacher instructing three classes, were selected from two middle schools. For each teacher, one of the classes was taught with a traditional approach (no cooperative goal structure). The other two classes were assigned to a cooperative goal structure (role assignment and non-role assignment). For the role-assignment class, each student was assigned a specific role, but students in both traditional and non-role assignment classes were not assigned roles. The Classroom Observation Instrument in Science Laboratory Activity (COISLA), which includes investigative skills (i.e., managing, manipulating, observing, reading, writing, and reporting); social skills (i.e., discussing, encouraging) and non-learning behaviors (i.e., waiting, off-task), was used to measure the levels of group cooperation. The grades on lab reports and lab quizzes of students who were taught by the same teacher were compared to assess the effects of the different learning conditions. No significant differences on the students' final achievement were found with respect to the three instructional approaches followed by each teacher. The teacher effect was more significant than either instructional approach on managing, manipulating, observing, reading, and writing behaviors. No significant teacher effect was found for the other behaviors. Only one treatment effect was significant, writing behavior. Overall, the teacher effect was more influential than instructional approach on students' behaviors. In teacher A's classes, reading behavior predicted 21% of students' achievement. However, no significant correlations existed between the ten collaborative behaviors and students' achievement in teacher B's classes.
Relation: 博士; 美國奧勒岡州立大學科學教育研究所
Appears in Collections:[物理學系] 專書

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
index.html0KbHTML436View/Open


All items in NCUEIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

 


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback