Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
The Construction of the Community Disaster Prevention Learning Indicators
Community disaster prevention education;Community learning;Learning indicators
|Issue Date: ||2015-06-08T07:46:45Z
This study explores the content of community education/learning, clarify its meaning and combine in-depth surveys with interviews and then preliminarily construct the hierarchy frame of the community disaster prevention indicators. Delphi method is used to evaluate and modify the importance degree of the indicators. The results of the study are three system aspects of the indicators, twelve concrete names of the indicators, and contents of the fifty-six indicators: community fundamental system, includes community consciousness solidarity, community organization construction, and community affair involvement; community disaster prevention learning system, includes disaster prevention learning system opening, integration of disaster prevention learning resources, innovation of disaster prevention method, disaster prevention learning in daily situations, and construction of learning disaster prevention community; community sustainable system, includes mastery of community disaster issue, education of disaster prevention knowledge and ability, pursuit of social and environmental righteousness, and construction of sustainable development. As for the importance comments of the concrete names and the contents of the indicators, they were evaluated as the "main indicator" (very important, important) by the majority, especially the part of "disaster prevention learning in daily situations" and "mastery of community disaster issue" were approved by the experts. Fifty percent of the contents of the indicators was evaluated "very important"; however, seventy-five percent of the content of "construction of learning disaster prevention community" was evaluated as "average", which shows that the relation discussion between the "community disaster prevention learning" and "learning community" needs to be strengthened in order to be approved by the experts. Since the indicators were not evaluated as unimportant and very unimportant, apparently the experts highly approve the indicators of this study, which can be viewed as an important reference of the community disaster prevention learning in Taiwan.
|Relation: ||華岡地理學報, 25: 1-19|
|Appears in Collections:||[地理學系] 期刊論文|
Files in This Item:
All items in NCUEIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.